↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Coexistence of primary colorectal follicular lymphoma and multiple myeloma: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Coexistence of primary colorectal follicular lymphoma and multiple myeloma: a case report
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s171387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Saito, Kencho Miyashita, Yosuke Miura, Reiki Ogasawara, Minoru Kanaya, Koh Izumiyama, Akio Mori, Takeshi Kondo, Masanori Tanaka, Masanobu Morioka, Shinya Tanaka

Abstract

Colorectal follicular lymphoma (FL) occurs less frequently than duodenal-type FL, which is an established entity, and primary multiple FL only involving the colon is rare. Furthermore, the coexistence of lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM) within the same patient is rare and the current study reports such a case. The patient was an asymptomatic 62-year-old man. He underwent colonoscopy screening, which revealed at least five polypoid tumors from the cecum to the rectum. Biopsy samples stained positive for CD20 and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) but stained negative for CD10, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis identified IGH/BCL2 in 95.2% of the tumor cells. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with FL. On the bone marrow aspirate, the plasma cell count was 30% of all nucleated cells. Bence-Jones κ-type protein was detected by protein electrophoresis in serum and urine. The serum-free light chain κ/λ level was significantly elevated (484.3). Thus, the patient was also diagnosed with MM. Both FL and MM were targeted therapeutically; rituximab and bendamustine were effective for FL, and lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone were effective for MM. The patient was treated for 3 years and 7 months and, until now, was off-treatment for 4 years without rapid progression of the two malignancies. Although both diseases are still present, the patient has maintained stable disease. Our findings suggest that lymphoma and MM should be targeted separately as independent hematological malignancies when they occur concurrently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,535,139
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#1,160
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,460
of 335,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.