↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Astragaloside IV represses high glucose-induced mesangial cells activation by enhancing autophagy via SIRT1 deacetylation of NF-κB P65 subunit

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Astragaloside IV represses high glucose-induced mesangial cells activation by enhancing autophagy via SIRT1 deacetylation of NF-κB P65 subunit
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s174058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaolei Wang, Yanbin Gao, Nianxiu Tian, Zhiyao Zhu, Tao Wang, Jiayi Xu, Bingjie Wu, Nan Zhang

Abstract

Mesangial cell (MC) activation plays an important role in many glomerular diseases associated with renal fibrosis, including diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The aim of this study was to determine whether Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) modulated MC activation in DKD via autophagy by specifically regulating the autophagy inducer sirtuin 1 (SIRT1). Cultured MCs and diabetic KK-Ay mice were treated with AS-IV, and the markers and regulatory mediators of autophagy were analyzed using Western blotting, real-time PCR, ELISA and IF. AS-IV inhibited MC activation and enhanced autophagy in hyperglycemic conditions by increasing SIRT1 expression and decreasing NF-κB p65 acetylation. In addition, the SIRT1 activator SRT1720 enhanced autophagy and decreased p65 acetylation during hyperglycemia-induced MC activation. Opposite effects were seen with the SIRT1 inhibitor EX527. Furthermore, the ameliorative effect of AS-IV on MCs was abolished by the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA, while the autophagy activator rapamycin restored hyperglycemia-induced MC activation. Finally, AS-IV improved renal function and fibrosis in the diabetic KK-Ay mice. AS-IV ameliorated renal function and morphology by inducing autophagy and inhibiting MC activation through the SIRT1-NF-κB pathway, indicating a potential therapeutic role of AS-IV in glomerular diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,867,974
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,758
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,005
of 346,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#59
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.