↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

“I don’t know exactly what you’re referring to”: the challenge of values elicitation in decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
“I don’t know exactly what you’re referring to”: the challenge of values elicitation in decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s173705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra L Carroll, Gayathri Embuldeniya, Jasprit Pannag, Krystina B Lewis, Jeff S Healey, Michael McGillion, Lehana Thabane, Dawn Stacey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#915
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,076
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#32
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.