| Title |
The impact of first and second eye cataract surgeries on falls: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s164419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Ru Feng, Lynn B Meuleners, Michelle L Fraser, Kate J Brameld, Seraina Agramunt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,161,122
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#111
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,438
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.