↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adherence to GOLD guideline treatment recommendations among pulmonologists in Turkey

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Adherence to GOLD guideline treatment recommendations among pulmonologists in Turkey
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2015
DOI 10.2147/copd.s85324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elif Sen, Salih Zeki Guclu, Isil Kibar, Ulku Ocal, Veysel Yilmaz, Onur Celik, Filiz Cimen, Fusun Topcu, Meltem Orhun, Hikmet Tereci, Aylin Konya, Idilhan Ar, Sevgi Saryal

Abstract

Low adherence to Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline recommendations has been reported worldwide. There has been no study on the adherence to GOLD guidelines for COPD treatment in Turkey. To investigate the rates of adherence to GOLD 2010 guidelines for COPD treatment among pulmonologists. A multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study was carried out in eleven pulmonary outpatient clinics across Turkey. Adherence to GOLD was evaluated through hospital records. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Study included 719 patients (mean age: 62.9±9.7 years; males 85.4%) of whom 16 was classified as GOLD Stage I, 238 as II, 346 as III, and 119 as IV, and only 59.5% received appropriate treatment. Rates of guideline adherence varied across GOLD stages (I, 6.3%; II, 14.7%; III, 84.4%; and IV, 84%). Causes of inappropriate therapies were overtreatment (Stage I, 100% and Stage II, 91.1%), undertreatment (Stage III, 3.3% and Stage IV, 10.9%) and lack of treatment (Stage II, 3.8%; Stage III, 2.3%; and Stage IV, 5.9%). The most preferred regimen (43.4%) was long-acting β2-agonist-inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting muscarinic antagonist. Overall, 614 patients (89%) received treatment containing inhaled corticosteroid. Pulmonologists in Turkey have low rates of adherence to GOLD guidelines in COPD treatment. Inappropriateness of therapies was due to overtreatment in early stages and excessive use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in all disease stages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,016
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,884
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#27
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.