↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Developing compassionate leadership in health care: an integrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 129)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
646 Mendeley
Title
Developing compassionate leadership in health care: an integrative review
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, December 2015
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s93724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paquita C de Zulueta

Abstract

Compassionate health care is universally valued as a social and moral good to be upheld and sustained. Leadership is considered pivotal for enabling the development and preservation of compassionate health care organizations. Strategies for developing compassionate health care leadership in the complex, fast-moving world of today will require a paradigm shift from the prevalent dehumanizing model of the organization as machine to one of the organizations as a living complex adaptive system. It will also require the abandonment of individualistic, heroic models of leadership to one of shared, distributive, and adaptive leadership. "Command and control" leadership, accompanied by stifling regulation, rigid prescriptions, coercive punishments, and/or extrinsic rewards, infuses fear into the system with consequent disempowerment and disunity within the workforce, and the attrition of innovation and compassion. It must be eschewed. Instead, leadership should be developed throughout the organization with collective holistic learning strategies combined with high levels of staff support and engagement. Culture and leadership are interdependent and synergistic; their codevelopment needs to be grounded in a sophisticated, scientifically based account of human nature held within a coherent philosophical framework reflected by modern organizational and leadership theories. Developing leadership for compassionate care requires acknowledging and making provision for the difficulties and challenges of working in an anxiety-laden context. This means providing appropriate training and well-being programs, sustaining high levels of trust and mutually supportive interpersonal connections, and fostering the sharing of knowledge, skills, and workload across silos. It requires enabling people to experiment without fear of reprisal, to reflect on their work, and to view errors as opportunities for learning and improvement. Tasks and relational care need to be integrated into a coherent unity, creating space for real dialog between patients, clinicians, and managers, so that together they can cocreate ways to flourish in the context of illness and dying.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 646 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 645 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 158 24%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Student > Postgraduate 26 4%
Other 98 15%
Unknown 229 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 124 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 74 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 11%
Psychology 41 6%
Social Sciences 29 4%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 244 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#823,469
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#2
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,694
of 396,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them