| Title |
Comparing the effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) with guided imagery on pain severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s158981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nasrin Ghanbari Nia, Ardashir Afrasiabifar, Mohammad Behnammoghadam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,670,848
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#496
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,473
of 336,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#20
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.