| Title |
Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s69660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taddele Kibret, Danielle Richer, Joseph Beyene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 11 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,651,503
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#578
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,697
of 363,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.