↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Use of antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care during a period of economic crisis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Use of antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care during a period of economic crisis
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s91227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoni Sicras-Mainar, Ruth Navarro-Artieda

Abstract

To describe antidepressant (AD) use in the treatment of major depressive disorder during a period of economic crisis. This was a retrospective, observational study using population-based databases. Two periods were considered: 1) 2008-2009, precrisis, and 2) 2012-2013, economic crisis. Certain inclusion/exclusion criteria were taken into account for the study (initiation of AD treatment). Patients were followed up for 12 months. The main measures were use (defined daily doses), epidemiologic measures, strategies used and treatment persistence, referrals, and use of resources. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. In the precrisis period, 3,662 patients were enrolled, and 5,722 were enrolled in the period of economic crisis. Average age was 58.8 years and 65.4% were women. Comparing the two periods, major depressive disorder prevalence was 5.4% vs 8.1%, P<0.001. During the period of economic crisis, AD use rose by 35.2% and drug expenditures decreased by 38.7%. Defined daily dose per patient per day was 10.0 mg vs 13.5 mg, respectively, P<0.001. At 12-month follow-up, the majority of patients (60.8%) discontinued the treatment or continued on the same medication as before, and in 23.3% a change of AD was made. Primary health care professionals are highly involved in the management of the illness; in addition, during the period of economic crisis, patients with major depressive disorder showed higher rates of prevalence of the illness, with increased use of AD drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,298,886
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,423
of 3,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,445
of 396,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#40
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.