| Title |
Development of a method to maximize the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation intensity in women with fibromyalgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s168297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol GT Vance, Ruth L Chimenti, Dana L Dailey, Katherine Hadlandsmyth, M Bridget Zimmerman, Katharine M Geasland, Jonathan M Williams, Ericka N Merriwether, Li Alemo Munters, Barbara A Rakel, Leslie J Crofford, Kathleen A Sluka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,430,186
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#748
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,031
of 355,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#42
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.