| Title |
The impact of sample type and procedural attributes on relative acceptability of different colorectal cancer screening regimens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s172143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne M Osborne, Ingrid Flight, Carlene J Wilson, Gang Chen, Julie Ratcliffe, Graeme P Young |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#641
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,680
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#23
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.