| Title |
Discovery, development, and clinical application of sugammadex sodium, a selective relaxant binding agent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s2757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Welliver, John McDonough, Nicholas Kalynych, Robert Redfern |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 32% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,311,901
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#269
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,149
of 172,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them