| Title |
Effect of the nanoformulation of siRNA-lipid assemblies on their cellular uptake and immune stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s136426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kohei Kubota, Kohei Onishi, Kazuaki Sawaki, Tianshu Li, Kaoru Mitsuoka, Takaaki Sato, Shinji Takeoka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,490,137
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#839
of 4,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,885
of 327,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#18
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.