Title |
Fasinumab (REGN475), an antinerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of acute sciatic pain: results of a proof-of-concept study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s65974 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linda Williams, Paul Tiseo, Haobo Ren, Scott Mellis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,419,366
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#391
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,599
of 231,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.