| Title |
Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s146258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Froes Meyer, Julio Davi Costa e Silva, Liliane Santos de Vasconcellos, Eneida de Morais Carreiro, Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,441,884
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#331
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,262
of 355,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.