| Title |
Skeleton labeled 13C-carbon nanoparticles for the imaging and quantification in tumor drainage lymph nodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s134493 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping Xie, Qian Xin, Sheng-Tao Yang, Tiantian He, Yuanfang Huang, Guangfu Zeng, Maosheng Ran, Xiaohai Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,470
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,092
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#46
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.