↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s93602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Muz, Rachel Nicole Ghazarian, Monica Ou, Micah John Luderer, Hubert Daniel Kusdono, Abdel Kareem Azab

Abstract

Despite the significant therapeutic advances achieved with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as bortezomib and carfilzomib in prolonging the survival of patients with multiple myeloma, the development of drug resistance, peripheral neuropathy, and pharmacokinetic limitations continue to pose major challenges when using these compounds. Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs. Unlike bortezomib and carfilzomib, which are administered by injection, ixazomib is the first oral PI approved by US Food and Drug Administration. This review discusses the biochemical properties, mechanisms of action, preclinical efficacy, and clinical trial results leading to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of ixazomib.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Chemistry 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,152,496
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#171
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,119
of 402,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#5
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.