Title |
Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of invasive fungal infections in adult patients. Prophylaxis, empirical, preemptive or targeted therapy, which is the best in the different hosts?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2008
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s3994 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rafael Zaragoza, Javier Pemán, Miguel Salavert, Ángel Viudes, Amparo Solé, Isidro Jarque, Emilio Monte, Eva Romá, Emilia Cantón |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Malaysia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#926
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,752
of 179,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.