↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Chronic care model in primary care: can it improve health-related quality of life?

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Chronic care model in primary care: can it improve health-related quality of life?
Published in
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/iprp.s92448
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faridah Md Yusof Aryani, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Siew Siang Chua, Li Ching Kok, Benny Efendie, Thomas Paraidathathu

Abstract

Chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia are public health concerns. However, little is known about how these affect patient-level health measures. The aim of the study was to examine the impact of a chronic care model (CCM) on the participant's health-related quality of life (QoL). Participants received either usual care or CCM by a team of health care professionals including pharmacists, nurses, dietitians, and general practitioners. The participants in the intervention group received medication counseling, adherence, and dietary advice from the health care team. The QoL was measured using the EQ-5D (EuroQoL-five dimension, health-related quality of life questionnaire) and comparison was made between usual care and intervention groups at the beginning and end of the study at 6 months. Mean (standard deviation) EQ-5D index scores improved significantly in the intervention group (0.92±0.10 vs 0.95±0.08; P≤0.01), but not in the usual care group (0.94±0.09 vs 0.95±0.09; P=0.084). Similarly, more participants in the intervention group reported improvements in their QoL compared with the usual care group, especially in the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions. The implementation of the CCM resulted in significant improvement in QoL. An interdisciplinary team CCM approach should be encouraged, to ultimately result in behavior changes and improve the QoL of the patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 33 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 32 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,303,845
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#66
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,843
of 393,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.