↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Best practices in the differential diagnosis and reporting of acute transfusion reactions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Transfusion Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Best practices in the differential diagnosis and reporting of acute transfusion reactions
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Transfusion Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijctm.s60920
Authors

Nancy Heddle, Christopher Hillis, Andrew Shih

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 38%
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,595,746
of 7,128,756 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Transfusion Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,664
of 318,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Transfusion Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,128,756 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them