The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
An investigation into the efficacy of intra-articular ozone (O2–O3) injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s175441 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Elnaz Tabibian, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan, Arash Babaei-Ghazani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,791,361
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#517
of 1,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,866
of 343,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#33
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.