↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lipegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia of cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Lipegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia of cancer patients
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/btt.s58597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Guariglia, Maria Carmen Martorelli, Rosa Lerose, Donatella Telesca, Maria Rita Milella, Pellegrino Musto

Abstract

Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) are frequent and potentially fatal toxicities of myelosuppressive anticancer treatments. The introduction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) in clinical practice has remarkably reduced the duration and severity of neutropenia, as well as the incidence of FN, thus allowing the administration of chemotherapeutic agents at the optimal dose and time with lower risk. The current scenario of G-CSFs in Europe includes filgrastim, lenograstim, some G-CSF biosimilars, and pegfilgrastim. Recently, a novel long-acting G-CSF, lipegfilgrastim, became available. Lipegfilgrastim is a glycopegylated G-CSF, alternative to pegfilgrastim, and has shown in randomized trials, to be equivalent to pegfilgrastim in reducing the incidence of severe neutropenia and FN in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, with a similar safety profile. Furthermore, lipegfilgrastim was more effective than the placebo in reducing the incidence of severe neutropenia, its duration, and time to absolute neutrophil count recovery, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive therapy. Although the number of studies currently published is still limited, lipegfilgrastim seems to be a promising drug in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#89
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,193
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them