↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Facebook as a tool for communication, collaboration, and informal knowledge exchange among members of a multisite family health team

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Facebook as a tool for communication, collaboration, and informal knowledge exchange among members of a multisite family health team
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s94676
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha K Lofters, Morgan B Slater, Emily Nicholas Angl, Fok-Han Leung

Abstract

To implement and evaluate a private Facebook group for members of a large Ontario multisite Family Health Team (FHT) to facilitate improved communication and collaboration. Program implementation and subsequent survey of team members. A large multisite FHT in Toronto, Ontario. Health professionals of the FHT. Usage patterns and self-reported perceptions of the Facebook group by team members. At the time of the evaluation survey, the Facebook group had 43 members (37.4% of all FHT members). Activity in the group was never high, and posts by team members who were not among the researchers were infrequent throughout the study period. The content of posts fell into two broad categories: 1) information that might be useful to various team members and 2) questions posed by team members that others might be able to answer. Of the 26 team members (22.6%) who completed the evaluation survey, many reported that they never logged into the Facebook page (16 respondents), and never used it to communicate with team members outside of their own site of practice (19 respondents). Only six respondents reported no concerns with using Facebook as a professional communication tool; the most frequent concerns were regarding personal and patient privacy. The use of social media by health care practitioners is becoming ubiquitous. However, the issues of privacy concerns and determining how to use social media without adding to provider workload must be addressed to make it a useful tool in health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,221,179
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#120
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,510
of 400,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.