| Title |
Terminology of chronic pain: the need to "level the playing field"
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s99629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John F Peppin, Michael E Schatman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 330 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 168 | 51% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 280 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 9% |
| Scientists | 9 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#100,135
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#18
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,520
of 402,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.