↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Association between interleukin-6 polymorphisms and urinary system cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Association between interleukin-6 polymorphisms and urinary system cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s94348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaiping Zhang, Li Zhang, Jun Zhou, Zongyao Hao, Song Fan, Cheng Yang, Chaozhao Liang

Abstract

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional proinflammatory cytokine involved in cancer initiation and progression. Numerous studies have investigated the associations between IL-6 polymorphisms (IL-6 -174G>C, -592G>C, -597G>A) and risk of urinary system cancers, including prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell cancer. However, conclusions from these studies were controversial. Thus, we conducted the current meta-analysis to obtain the comprehensive profile regarding the association between IL-6 polymorphisms and urinary system cancer risk. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the associations of IL-6 polymorphisms with urinary system cancer were searched from database and analyzed using STATA 12.0 statistical software. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the associations. A total of 20 previous publications consisting of 15,033 cases and 17,655 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Significant association was observed in overall population regarding IL-6 -592G>C polymorphisms (G vs C: OR =0.1.30, 95% CI =1.13-2.52; GG vs CC: OR =1.81, 95% CI =1.31-2.52; GG vs GC + CC: OR =1.33, 95% CI =1.02-1.75; GG + GC vs CC: OR =1.41, 95% CI =1.09-1.83). In the stratified analyses by ethnicity, the significant associations were found among Asian (GG vs CC: OR =1.89, 95% CI =1.34-2.66; GG + GC vs CC: OR =1.43, 95% CI =1.09-1.87) and Black population (GC vs CC: OR =0.20, 95% CI =0.05-0.82) rather than Caucasian men. Likewise, there were noticeable associations in almost all the other subanalyses such as cancer types, control sources, genotyped methods, and sample sizes. However, no significant associations were identified between any of IL-6 -174G>C polymorphisms with urinary system cancer, except for Asian population (G vs C: OR =0.81, 95% CI =0.70-0.95; GG vs CC: OR =0.51, 95% CI =0.35-0.74; GC vs CC: OR =0.49, 95% CI =0.33-0.72; GG + GC vs CC: OR =0.50, 95% CI =0.35-0.72; respectively). In addition, no significant associations were detected between IL-6 -597G>A polymorphism and urinary system cancer, regardless of whole or subgroups. This meta-analysis presents a relatively comprehensive view of the associations between IL-6 polymorphism and urinary system cancer risk to explore the carcinogenic mechanisms, which will help shed light on the clinical diagnosis and therapy for urinary system cancer. However, further detailed studies are needed to verify our conclusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#744
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,827
of 399,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#29
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.