| Title |
Intracameral dexamethasone injection in the treatment of cataract surgery induced inflammation: design, development, and place in therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s165722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tirth J Shah, Mandi D Conway, Gholam A Peyman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,158
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,065
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#31
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.