| Title |
Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s179808 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob AB Oostendorp, Hans Elvers, Emiel van Trijffel, Geert M Rutten, Gwendolyne GM Scholten-Peeters, Marcel Heijmans, Erik Hendriks, Emilia Mikolajewska, Margot De Kooning, Marjan Laekeman, Jo Nijs, Nathalie Roussel, Han Samwel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,342,348
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#269
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,137
of 364,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.