↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

What are the effective ways to translate clinical leadership into health care quality improvement?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 129)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
What are the effective ways to translate clinical leadership into health care quality improvement?
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s46170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert McSherry, Paddy Pearce

Abstract

The presence and/or absence of effective leaders in health care can have a stark consequence on the quality and outcomes of care. The delivery of safe, quality, compassionate health care is dependent on having effective clinical leaders at the frontline. In light of the Kirkup and Francis reports, this article explores some ways of translating clinical leadership into health care quality improvement. This is achieved by exploring what is clinical leadership and why and how this is important to health care quality improvement, clinical leadership, and a duty of candor, along with the importance clinical leadership plays in the provision of quality care improvement and outcomes. Clinical leaders are not predefined roles but emerge from the complex clinical setting by gaining an acquired expertise and from how they then internalize this to develop and facilitate sound relationships within a team. Clinical leaders are effective in facilitating innovation and change through improvement. This is achieved by recognizing, influencing, and empowering individuals through effective communication in order to share and learn from and with each other in practice. The challenge for health care organizations in regard to creating organizational cultures where a duty of candor exists is not to reinvent the wheel by turning something that is simple into something complex, which can become confusing to health care workers, patients, and the public. By focusing on the clinical leader's role and responsibilities we would argue they play a crucial and pivotal role in influencing, facilitating, supporting, and monitoring that this duty of candor happens in practice. This may be possible by highlighting where and how the duty of candor can be aligned within existing clinical governance frameworks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 21%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Researcher 10 4%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 84 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 65 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 9%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 91 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,494,832
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#6
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,049
of 407,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them