↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues

Overview of attention for article published in The Application of Clinical Genetics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues
Published in
The Application of Clinical Genetics, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/tacg.s85361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Gekas, Sylvie Langlois, Vardit Ravitsky, François Audibert, David Gradus van den Berg, Hazar Haidar, François Rousseau

Abstract

Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA (cfDNA screening) was proposed to reduce the number of invasive procedures in current prenatal diagnosis for fetal aneuploidies. We review here the clinical and ethical issues of cfDNA screening. To date, it is not clear how cfDNA screening is going to impact the performances of clinical prenatal diagnosis and how it could be incorporated in real life. The direct marketing to users may have facilitated the early introduction of cfDNA screening into clinical practice despite limited evidence-based independent research data supporting this rapid shift. There is a need to address the most important ethical, legal, and social issues before its implementation in a mass setting. Its introduction might worsen current tendencies to neglect the reproductive autonomy of pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,366,336
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,001
of 408,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them