| Title |
Comparative efficacy of inhaled medications (ICS/LABA, LAMA, LAMA/LABA and SAMA) for COPD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s173472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Ismail Abdul Aziz, Ling Eng Tan, David Bin-Chia Wu, Fiona Pearce, Gerald Seng Wee Chua, Liang Lin, Ping-Tee Tan, Kwong Ng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,865,331
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#309
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,796
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#9
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.