↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adjuvant therapies for Parkinson’s disease: critical evaluation of safinamide

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Adjuvant therapies for Parkinson’s disease: critical evaluation of safinamide
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s77749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrizio Stocchi, Margherita Torti

Abstract

Safinamide (SAF) is a new drug developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). It is a benzylamino derivative with multiple mechanisms of action and antiparkinsonian, anticonvulsant, and neuroprotective properties. SAF inhibits monoamine oxidase B and dopamine reuptake and glutamate release, blocks voltage-dependent sodium channels, and modulates calcium channels. Although the antiparkinsonian effect can be ascribed in part to the inhibition of the monoamine oxidase B, which is complete at 50 mg, the enhanced benefit seen at the 100 mg dose is probably due to nondopaminergic mechanisms. SAF will represent an important option for patients with both early and advanced PD. In early PD patients, the addition of SAF to dopamine agonists may be an effective treatment strategy to improve motor function, prolong the use of dopamine agonists, and/or delay the introduction of levodopa. In advanced parkinsonian patients, SAF has been demonstrated to significantly increase on time with no, or nontroublesome dyskinesias. All studies performed have demonstrated its efficacy in benefiting both short-term and long-term quality-of-life outcomes in both early and advanced PD patients. SAF has been investigated in long-term (24 months), double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, where it showed a very good safety profile. SAF has not been studied in de novo PD patients, and its potential positive effect on dyskinesia deserves further dedicated studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 10%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,138,640
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#171
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,297
of 406,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#5
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.