The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Danish Childhood Cancer Registry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/clep.s99508 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henrik Schrøder, Catherine Rechnitzer, Peder Skov Wehner, Steen Rosthøj, Jens Kjølseth Møller, Birgitte Lausen, Gitte Petersen, Mette Nørgaard |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,701,276
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#336
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,446
of 334,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.