↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recurrence and prognostic model for identifying patients at risk for esophageal cancer after surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Recurrence and prognostic model for identifying patients at risk for esophageal cancer after surgery
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, November 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s186194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongni Chen, Weidong Wang, Youfang Chen, Jia Hu, Men Yang, Junxian Mo, Zhesheng Wen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,542,814
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,405
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,823
of 351,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#86
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.