Title |
The subjective perception of past, present, and future time in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s186081 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Azusa Shiromaru-Sugimoto, Hidetomo Murakami, Akinori Futamura, Motoyasu Honma, Takeshi Kuroda, Mitsuru Kawamura, Kenjiro Ono |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
Linguistics | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,893,782
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#648
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,567
of 364,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#12
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.