↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Strategies to improve anxiety and depression in patients with COPD: a mental health perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Strategies to improve anxiety and depression in patients with COPD: a mental health perspective
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s79354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Athanasios Tselebis, Argyro Pachi, Ioannis Ilias, Epaminondas Kosmas, Dionisios Bratis, Georgios Moussas, Nikolaos Tzanakis

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory lung disease characterized by progressive and only partially reversible symptoms. Worldwide, the incidence of COPD presents a disturbing continuous increase. Anxiety and depression are remarkably common in COPD patients, but the evidence about optimal approaches for managing psychological comorbidities in COPD remains unclear and largely speculative. Pharmacological treatment based on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors has almost replaced tricyclic antidepressants. The main psychological intervention is cognitive behavioral therapy. Of particular interest are pulmonary rehabilitation programs, which can reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms in these patients. Although the literature on treating anxiety and depression in patients with COPD is limited, we believe that it points to the implementation of personalized strategies to address their psychopathological comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 248 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 17%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 79 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 18%
Psychology 23 9%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 85 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,212,735
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#158
of 3,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,486
of 407,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#7
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.