| Title |
The good, the bad, and the ugly of calcium supplementation: a review of calcium intake on human health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s157523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelvin Li, Xia-Fang Wang, Ding-You Li, Yuan-Cheng Chen, Lan-Juan Zhao, Xiao-Gang Liu, Yan-Fang Guo, Jie Shen, Xu Lin, Jeffrey Deng, Rou Zhou, Hong-Wen Deng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 402 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 163 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 181 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#196,671
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#20
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,946
of 364,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.