↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2018
DOI 10.2147/opth.s183249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven C Schallhorn, Stephen J Hannan, David Teenan, Martina Pelouskova, Julie M Schallhorn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 22 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 23 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#998
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,794
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#27
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.