| Title |
Xerostomia and hyposalivation in orthogeriatric patients with fall history and impact on oral health-related quality of life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s178370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Greta Barbe, Pia Schmidt, Michael Bussmann, Henning Kunter, Michael Johannes Noack, Gabriele Röhrig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,281
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,153
of 357,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#43
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.