| Title |
Intravenous tranexamic acid use in revision total joint arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s175407 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng-Chih Kuo, Pao-Yen Lin, Jun-Wen Wang, Po-Chun Lin, Mel S Lee, Antonia F Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#304
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,957
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.