| Title |
Improving safety and efficiency in care: multi-stakeholders’ perceptions associated with a peritoneal dialysis virtual care solution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s181604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lianne Jeffs, Trevor Jamieson, Marianne Saragosa, Geetha Mukerji, Arsh K Jain, Rachel Man, Laura Desveaux, James Shaw, Payal Agarwal, Jennifer M Hensel, Maria Maione, Megan Nguyen, Nike Onabajo, R Sacha Bhatia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,322,363
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#599
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,159
of 448,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#16
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.