| Title |
Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Effectiveness Research, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cer.s69605 |
| Authors |
Makalapua Motu'apuaka, Evelyn Whitlock, Johanna Anderson, Robin Paynter, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Erika Cottrell, Elisabeth Kato, Stacey Uhl, Suzanne Belinson, Christine Chang, Ties Hoomans, David Meltzer, Hussein Noorani, Karen Robinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 41% |