| Title |
Potential therapeutic effects of Cordyceps cicadae and Paecilomyces cicadae on adenine-induced chronic renal failure in rats and their phytochemical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s180543 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling Li, Tong Zhang, Chunru Li, Lu Xie, Ning Li, Tianling Hou, Yuqin Wang, Bing Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,674,193
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#656
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,507
of 448,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#11
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.