↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reducing the risk of music-induced hearing loss from overuse of portable listening devices: understanding the problems and establishing strategies for improving awareness in adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 145)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Reducing the risk of music-induced hearing loss from overuse of portable listening devices: understanding the problems and establishing strategies for improving awareness in adolescents
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s74103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory DF Portnuff

Abstract

Hearing loss from the overuse of portable listening devices (PLDs), such as MP3 players or iPods, is of great concern in the popular media. This review aims to discuss the current state of scientific knowledge about music-induced hearing loss from PLD use. This report evaluates the literature on the risk to hearing from PLD use, the individual and psychological factors that influence PLD usage, and strategies for reducing exposure to music through PLDs. Specific interventions are reviewed, and several recommendations for designing interventions and for individual intervention in clinical practice are presented. Clinical recommendations suggested include the "80-90 rule" and the use of isolator-style earphones to reduce background noise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 49 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 55 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#322,872
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#8
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,850
of 407,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.