Title |
Role of nutrients in metabolic syndrome: a 2017 update
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/nds.s148987 |
Authors |
Hua J Kern, Susan Hazels Mitmesser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 23% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#45
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,006
of 440,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.