↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Role of nutrients in metabolic syndrome: a 2017 update

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Role of nutrients in metabolic syndrome: a 2017 update
Published in
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/nds.s148987
Authors

Hua J Kern, Susan Hazels Mitmesser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 23%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#45
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,006
of 440,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.