| Title |
Screening mammography use in older women according to health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s171739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Demb, Tomi Akinyemiju, Isabel Allen, Tracy Onega, Robert A Hiatt, Dejana Braithwaite |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,348,431
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#689
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,370
of 355,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#25
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.