↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The cognitive and psychosocial effects of auditory training and hearing aids in adults with hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
The cognitive and psychosocial effects of auditory training and hearing aids in adults with hearing loss
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s183905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Nkyekyer, Denny Meyer, Andrew Pipingas, Nicholas S Reed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 60 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 66 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,255
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,357
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.