↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Techniques for estimating health care costs with censored data: an overview for the health services researcher

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Techniques for estimating health care costs with censored data: an overview for the health services researcher
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s31552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harindra C Wijeysundera, Xuesong Wang, George Tomlinson, Dennis T Ko, Murray D Krahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 17%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#150
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,954
of 179,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.