↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Investigation of prostate resected weight on postoperative sexual dysfunction following transurethral resection of prostate surgery: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Investigation of prostate resected weight on postoperative sexual dysfunction following transurethral resection of prostate surgery: a population-based study
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s186822
Authors

Fu-Chao Liu, Shih-Jyun Shen, Jr-Rung Lin, Huang-Ping Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#11,199,007
of 14,123,515 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#813
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,478
of 368,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,123,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them