↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Long noncoding RNAs in gastric cancer: functions and clinical applications

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Long noncoding RNAs in gastric cancer: functions and clinical applications
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s95412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajun Wang, Jingxu Sun, Jun Wang, Yongxi Song, Peng Gao, Jinxin Shi, Ping Chen, Zhenning Wang

Abstract

Over the last two decades, genome-wide studies have revealed that only a small fraction of the human genome encodes proteins; long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) account for 98% of the total genome. These RNA molecules, which are >200 nt in length, play important roles in diverse biological processes, including the immune response, stem cell pluripotency, cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, invasion, and metastasis by regulating gene expression at the epigenetic, transcriptional, and posttranscriptional levels. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying lncRNA function are only partially understood. Recent studies showed that many lncRNAs are aberrantly expressed in gastric cancer (GC) tissues, gastric juice, plasma, and cells, and these alterations are linked to the occurrence, progression, and outcome of GC. Here, we review the current knowledge of the biological functions and clinical aspects of lncRNAs in GC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 25%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#720
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,931
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#29
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.