| Title |
Efficacy of nystatin for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s100795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Lyu, Chen Zhao, Zhi-min Yan, Hong Hua |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 465 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 104 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 183 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 190 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,432,988
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#494
of 2,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,402
of 313,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.